Glowing Kitties of DOOM!

By: Myles Power Edited by: Hannah

In my opinion, the Internet has been one of the greatest achievements of mankind. The ability to share information and ideas instantaneously has changed they way we communicate, do business, develop relationships, conduct research and express ourselves. The Internet is not owned or controlled by any person, company or nation, allowing for material that would be censored to be released worldwide. This has led to – amongst other things – the downfall of goverments and companies with shady business techniques. Let’s not forget that the Internet is also responsible for keeping us updated on the world of Cats Doing People Things. However for all the benefits the Internet offers us, it is also a place where we always have to be sceptical, as it’s simply rife with misinformation. It can be compared to a game of Chinese whispers; a place where the work of scientists can be bent, twisted and manipulated until it no longer resembles the original work. A perfect example of this can be found in a post named “Genetic Modification Gone Wild: 10 Signs That Our World May Be Destined To Resemble A Really Bad Science Fiction Movie”, whose sources include the Daily Mail, Alex Jones and Sky News.

The post is obviously a ‘fear piece’, created for the most paranoid of readers, which explains why the advertisements on the website are for LPC Survival, Emergency Essentials (C) and for a survival food sale. The only picture in the post is one of a number of human pickled fetuses that have nothing to do with any of the research mentioned and are obviously there to mislead the reader into thinking that they are the product of genetic modification. The post states: “Most people believe that scientists only have our best interests at heart and that they would never do anything weird or dangerous”. It then goes on to say, “Well, read the following examples of genetic modification below and decide for yourself whether or not things have gotten out of control”. The post then lists ten examples of research which the author believes are examples of scientists going too far and may result in the world resembling a “really bad science fiction movie”. They include the development and research of so-called enviropigs, spider goats and monster salmon.

Continue reading

Coalition of Environmentalists Report on Synthetic Biology

By: Myles Power Edited by: Hannah

As many of you will know, I am not a big fan of David Shukman (BBC Science Editor). This dislike came from watching his biased broadcast on the BBC, in which he cast a shadow on the hard work of synthetic biologists and the subject as a whole. I later found out that at the same time, he published a related article on the BBC news website. It was just as misinformed and alarmist as the broadcast and inexcusably made a link between synthetic biology and the accidental release of the foot-and-mouth virus in 2007. It also came with links to reports from Lloyd’s of London and a coalition of environmentalists, which had been quoted in the broadcast. The Lloyd’s of London report was factually incorrect (DNA is a binary code, all organisms have chromosomes, etc), but it did come with a disclaimer saying, “Whilst all care has been taken to ensure the accuracy of the information, Lloyd’s does not accept any responsibility for any errors and omissions”. It suggested real possible dangers for this technology in a non-alarmist way by simply stating them. However the report from the coalition of environmentalists (The Principles for the Oversight of Synthetic Biology) was the complete opposite.

Continue reading

Bad Science in Prometheus

By: Myles Power Edited by: Hannah

In my opinion, Prometheus (Ridley Scott’s highly anticipated prequel to Alien) was one of the most disappointing movies I have seen since the Phantom Menace. Now, I know what you are all thinking: “Myles, let’s not say anything we can’t take back”, but it’s true. Only once before have I had my hopes lifted so high, only to have them come crashing down at warp speed by a film that failed to deliver. Only once before have I ran into the cinema giggling like a school girl, only to come out hardened by yet another betrayal from Hollywood.

Before I get into why this film is so bad, I feel I have to talk about the positives. Visually, the film is stunning (unlike the badly ageing Phantom Menace),  the cinematography is flawless, and the first 30 minutes were very immersive. Soon after however, the plot holes, lack of explanations and lapses in common sense and logic from the characters begin to compound on the movie and 45 minutes in, it was broken. I still have no clue why the android would poison the scientist! I still have no clue why face-melting acid turned the ginger into a monster! I don’t know why they did not cast a old man to play Peter Weyland and what his caricature hoped to achieve by meeting one of the aliens. As well as nothing making any sense, it was not scary in the slightest. In fact, it was quite the opposite. I found myself bursting with laughter at the death of Meredith Vickers (Charlize Theron), which she could easily have prevented by walking two metres to her left.

Continue reading