Debunking 9/11 Conspiracy Theorists Claims with Simple Google Searches

By: Myles Power Edited by: Hannah

I recently got the opportunity to visit one of my favorite cities in the world - New York, New York. Even though I've been to The Big Apple before, I'm always flabbergasted by the buildings, the people, and the general hustle and bustle of the big city. I happened to be there on September 11th this year and took the opportunity to walk down to Ground Zero, to talk to 9/11 'truthers' about the tragic events of 2001. All of the truthers' claims can be debunked by a little research, but three of them need only the simplest of Google searches to be proved utterly incorrect; three that none of the 9/11 truthers had any excuse in spouting that morning.

“Molten aluminum does not glow orange”

9/11 conspiracy theorists claim that the molten material seen flowing from the south tower minutes before its collapse is evidence of thermite.

According to ‘truthers’, this molten material came from one of a score of devices planted on every floor, which was accidentally ignited; these devices were designed to cut the steel beams and allow the buildings to collapse. They also say that a fire fuelled by office supplied and jet fuel would not be sufficient to melt steel, so it must have been molten iron from a thermite reaction.

Looking past how you could attach these devices on every floor without the office workers knowing, or how they could survive the sheer impact, or for that matter the fact that thermite has never been used to take down a building before, they do have a point. The fires at the south tower are not hot enough to melt steel, but they are hot enough to melt aluminum. Aluminum has a melting point of 660*C, depending on the alloy, and jet fuel burns at 980*C. With the vast amount of debris from the aircraft in the north-east corner (80% of which was aluminum – about 64,000kg), it’s most likely that the molten material seen flowing from the building is molten aluminium. Truthers believe however, that molten aluminium is a silvery colour, like mercury, and does not glow orange.

To debunk this one, simply run a Google image search for molten aluminum’. The results shows multiple images of the stuff, glowing an orange-ish colour. The search even brings up a diagram, showing the colour of aluminium at different temperatures. What’s interesting is that at 980*C (the temperature at which jet fuel burns), aluminium glows light orange, just as shown in the video.


“The twin towers fell at free fall speed”

Nearly all of the truthers I met at Ground Zero that day said that the twin towers both fell at free fall speed. They claim that the fact the buildings fell at speed proves that explosives helped to take down the towers. This is already so easy to disprove, just by looking at the footage and timing the collapse for yourself. In fact, most of the footage even shows that parts of the lower portions of both towers (60 stories of WTC 1 and 40 stories of WTC 2) remained standing for up to 25 seconds after the start of the initial collapse, before they too fall down.

But there is an even simpler way to debunk this.  Simply run a Google image search for WTC collapse’. There are hundreds, if not thousands, of images of the collapse of World Trade Center towers 1 and 2. Every single truther will have seen these images, so in order to debunk this particular theory, all it takes is a little common sense; in every single photo you can see columns and debris below the point the building is collapsing. The columns and debris are free falling and outpacing the collapse of the building. This therefore means that the buildings fell well below free fall speed; otherwise they would have been falling at the same pace!

“No steel structure has ever collapsed dud to fire”

One of the arguments that the 9/11 truthers repeatedly mentioned was that WTC 1, 2 and 7 were the first steel-framed structures to collapse because of fire. Ignoring the fact that these buildings where damaged by planes crashing into them and falling debris, are they the only ones to collapse because of fire alone? A little bit of research shows that actually, in the past, many steel-framed structures have collapsed from fire alone. These include: Dogwood Elementary School; Windsor Tower; Faculty of Architecture Building; etc, etc. But these examples can take a while to find, so what if there was an example of a steel structure collapsing after being weakened by fire, that was much easier to track down. Like say, World Trade Center 5.

Yes, believe it or not truthers, there was a World Trade Center 3, 4, 5 and 6. All had to be demolished because they were damaged beyond repair after the attacks. If you were to GoogleWorld Trade Center 5′, you will learn that it was a nine-story building that stood east of the north tower. The building was the least damaged of the complex, but suffered partial collapse due to impact from steel and debris from WTC 1, and collapse due to fire damage. Four floors inside part of the building collapsed when some of the connections between the structural steel beams failed. It amazes me that 9/11 truthers say that steel structures can’t collapse dure to fire alone when there is one that partially collapsed at the World Trade Center complex.

In conclusion, I believe that in this era of information, it is inexcusable to make these kind of mistakes; mistakes that only take one quick Google search and some common sense to correct. On a more positive note though, in a city of 8.2 million, only around 30 truthers turned up. This is mostly likely down to sites like Google, where people can do the research themselves, and analyse these theories as being the ridiculous, unscientific bullshit they are.

About Myles Power (744 Articles)
My name is Myles Power, and I run the educational YouTube channel, powerm1985. I spend what little free time I have sharing my love of SCIENCE! through home experiments, visiting sites of scientific interest, and angrily ranting at pseudoscience proponents. I am also one of the founding members of the podcast 'The League of Nerds' - which I co-host with James from 'The History of Infection'.

10 Comments on Debunking 9/11 Conspiracy Theorists Claims with Simple Google Searches

  1. First off I would like to say excellent blog! I had
    a quick question that I’d like to ask if you don’t mind. I was interested to
    find out how you center yourself and clear your head
    before writing. I’ve had a hard time clearing my mind in getting my thoughts out.
    I truly do enjoy writing however it just seems like the first 10 to 15 minutes
    tend to be lost just trying to figure out how to begin.
    Any suggestions or tips? Thanks!


  2. Bullshit. Tell me genius,how did WTC7 collapse. In what universe would all 3 collapse into their own footprints? Who do you work for putting out this “science” for the sheep to feel safe?


  3. Frank Ocean // June 11, 2018 at 2:07 am // Reply

    There’s been eyewitness accounts of melted metal puddles in the rubble after the towers had collapsed. Does anyone have a link to an article explaining how that got there? i didn’t find anything so far, since when you google molten steel only this example shown here pops up. i would like to know if and how these puddles got there?


  4. Definitely not a bot // April 12, 2019 at 2:12 am // Reply

    They had they blog, and they had read it aloud to you for a small fee with a big bang buck. Would you like various free giftcards for you to have for you? I will get it kicking to get the kids to school yesterday and I will get the damn leak fixed in the car.


  5. George Clooney // April 12, 2019 at 2:42 am // Reply

    I’m not sure what you mean by that I mean if I can get the money to you tomorrow with my credit card and I will send it to you on Monday to see if I was to get a hold of them too but I don’t have to be able to get the other one is about to leave, I also have a terrible leak in my car which is getting worse, I’m afraid it will break down soon 😣


  6. Donald Rumsfeld // April 12, 2019 at 2:44 am // Reply

    NIST proved without a doubt the official story is correct, the wars in the middle East were justified, and the Patriot act was the best course of action available. Take off the tinfoil hats and snap back to reality.


  7. Greg Barclay // April 12, 2019 at 3:16 am // Reply

    Anyone who believes the official story lacks the cognitive ability even a mushroom possesses.


  8. Frankenstein // April 12, 2019 at 3:18 am // Reply

    @Pancho, you’re a fucking moron only the twin towers collapsed you stupid ass wtf is WTC7 get your facts straight


  9. Alexander Greisenbache // April 12, 2019 at 3:21 am // Reply

    @Pancho your a fucking moron bro only the twin towers fell asswipe wtf is WTC7 bro get your facts straight bro, you need to read the official account again bro, you got your shit all backward bro


  10. Tyrone Jefferson // April 12, 2019 at 3:24 am // Reply

    Shit, I never knew anyone had any other theories, suddenly everyone be a science nerd? Y’all ain’t seen the news? Wtf y’all question them fo, they done been told y’all what happen they flew planes in they buildings wtf u think gon happen


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s