#010 – F**K you Buck Mulligan – Talking to 9/11 Truther

Posted on November 19, 2017 in 9/11, F**K you Buck Mulligan, Podcast // 3 Comments

The self proclaimed best British author (seriously) Thomas Baden-Riess joins Buck to talk about why he believes that 9/11 was an inside job.

About Myles Power (744 Articles)

My name is Myles Power, and I run the educational YouTube channel, powerm1985. I spend what little free time I have sharing my love of SCIENCE! through home experiments, visiting sites of scientific interest, and angrily ranting at pseudoscience proponents. I am also one of the founding members of the podcast 'The League of Nerds' - which I co-host with James from 'The History of Infection'.

2 Comments on #010 – F**K you Buck Mulligan – Talking to 9/11 Truther

Steve hatton // November 20, 2017 at 11:26 pm // Reply

Why are you and your friend so aggressively against listening to and considering anomalies within a theory – i.e. 9/11 official story. Whatever the rights and wrongs of Baden – Riess it is scientifically ignorant to belittle someone who points out an anomaly in your view of events. Didn’t Fleming find differing moulds had formed in his lab on returning from travelling? Rather than dismissing the anomaly and cleaning everything down din’t questioned “why?” And didn’t he subsequently discover penicillin? You’ll probably find some error with that but maybe first think about the point of the story.
Specifically I understand that the data for WT7 model has not been released for peer review. But as I understand it this should have taken place as the model would prove something new and unique in the history of science (fires CAN destroy steel frames sky scrapers) and would therefore have fundamental global implications for architecture, fire safety, town plannning, building, fire regulations, evacuation procedures, e engineering etc etc.
Shouldn’t you as a scientist at least be asking for the right to peer review your own experts or do scientists just accept the word of others?
I think you could add so much intellectual input but you seem to have a closed mind for some reason.

Best regards
Steve

LikeLike
Bart // November 30, 2017 at 8:41 am // Reply

As someone with a degree in mathematics, I don’t see how this would make anyone an expert on buildings. It would give you a nice head start on the theoretical portion of an engineering and/or material science degree, sure, but so much practical information is missing that there’s no way you can have any kind of intuition.

If he did have any kind of practical background he would know how badly things scale in physics.

LikeLike