Debunking 9/11 Conspiracy Theorists
A sceptical look at claims made by ‘truther’ protestors at ground zero in September 2012 from the viewpoint of a chemist. For those of you who don’t know, a ‘truther’ is a person affiliated with the 9/11 Truth movement, who rejects the official explanation provided for the 9/11 attacks and instead claims that a US government conspiracy was to blame. The videos in this series cover everything from the alleged thermite found in the dust to the collapse of World Trade Centre 7. The videos debunk every claim made by the truthers by looking at the scientific literature and studying real video evidence of the attacks.
Debunking 9/11 conspiracy theorists part 7 of 7 – Flight 93 and my final thoughts.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GOSMpf6br1k Myles discusses why he made these videos, flight 93 and clears up a few points made in the comments. Video responses http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NYaB3uP0iuI http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VVLbT5NeAUE Debunkers blog post http://911debunkers.blogspot.co.uk/2012/12/taylor-contra-powers.html Interesting YouTube comments left on my 9/11 videos https://mylespower.co.uk/2013/01/08/interesting-youtube-comments-left-on-my-91… https://mylespower.co.uk/2013/01/08/more-interesting-youtube-comments-left-on-… LaLaLaLa http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CJREWDUfNzI
Debunking 9/11 conspiracy theorists part 6 of 7 – The psychology behind a 9/11 truther
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0TELiwR0Olk In this video a good friend of Myles, Dave talks about the psychology behind a truther and discusses how they think and why they think it.
Debunking 9/11 conspiracy theorists part 5 – The BBC, Larry Silverstein and the Pentagon
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YxljFOCZ6TU In this video Myles talks about the BBC reporting that WTC7 collapsed before it had, Larry Silverstein saying “pull it” and the footage from the Pentagon.
Debunking 9/11 conspiracy theorists part 4 -How did WTC7 collapsed
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7PpsCCTMP8w Myles discusses how the WTC7 collapses.
Debunking 9/11 conspiracy theorists part 3 -Thermate, thermite and glowing aluminium
In this video Myles discusses some of the claims made by thruthers that can be disproven with a simple google search. Claims such as Al does not glow red, cuts at the base of the WTC and the difference between thermate and thermite.
Debunking 9/11 conspiracy theorists part 2 – Nano-thermite found in the WTC dust
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wbjYoINw5oI In this video Myles discussed the truthers’ claims that a peer review paper proves that nano thermite was present at the WTC. Active Thermitic Material Discovered in Dust from the 9/11 World Trade Center Catastrophe Progress Report on the Analysis of Red/Gray Chips in WTC Dust Deconstructing Access Points
Debunking 9/11 conspiracy theorists part 1 – Free fall and how the towers collapsed
Myles Power confronts 9/11 truthers to see if their claims can stand up. In this video he discusses the World Trade Center’s Design to withstand airplane impacts, fule or oxygen-starved fires, HOW THE World Trade Center’s Collapse, the twin towers falling at free fall speed and the damage to the lobbies. Pictures from this episode
A Review of Dr. Judy Wood’s Book “Where Did The Towers Go?” – Where Did The Buildings Go?
It has been well over a year since I sat down and tried to wrap my head around another chapter of Dr Judy Wood’s copyright infringing magnum opus ‘Where did The Towers Go’. In the past, I have written about her misinterpretation of the seismic data collected by Columbia University,…
A Review of Dr. Judy Wood’s Book “Where Did The Towers Go?” – Dustification
Edited by Peter The more I read of Dr. Judy Wood’s book ‘Where did The Towers Go’ the more I think that those who promoted it to me as the proof that 9/11 was an inside job have not actually read it. There is no way that they could possibly get…
A Review of Dr. Judy Wood’s Book “Where Did The Towers Go?” #3 – Conventional Controlled Demolition
Edited by Peter & Ben It’s been over a year since I sat down to review another part of Dr Judy Wood’s book ‘Where Did The Towers Go?’ so I thought it’s about time I put on my tin foil hat and dived in. This time, let’s look at the…
A Review of Dr. Judy Wood’s Book “Where Did The Towers Go?” – The Jumpers
PART 2 Edited by Peter In the first two chapters of Dr. Judy Wood’s book, she talks about the collapse rate of the twin towers and how she believed it too be inconsistent with the official story. Although she is blatantly incorrect, she never strayed to far away from the…
The Video ‘9/11 And Flight 175 Alarming Footage’ Shows How Lazy Some People Are
If there’s one thing social media has shown me over the past 10 years, it’s just how lazy some people are when it comes to checking sources of outlandish claims. How many times have you been on Facebook and seen that one of your friends has posted a link to…
A Review of Liam Scheff’s Book Official Stories – 9/11 A Perfect Tuesday Morning
Official Stories reads like the transcript of a lobotomised, paranoid, drunk talking to himself in the pub. I have recently been involved in a little bit of internet drama after producing videos critical of the AIDS denialist documentary House of Numbers. To be more specific it was after I published…
The Apex Truther
By: Myles Power Edited by: James Gurney & Hannah . I recently made a series of seven videos on YouTube, critical of the 9/11 truth movement. For those of you who don’t know, the 9/11 truth movement are a group who reject the official explanation provided for the September 11th attacks and instead, claim complicity…
Architects and Engineers Eh?
I recently made a series of seven videos on YouTube critical of the 9/11 truth movement. The videos included footage of truthers (a person affiliated with the truth movement) I talked to outside ground zero on September 11th 2012. I have over three hours of footage and most of it…
Debunking 9/11 Conspiracy Theorists Claims with Simple Google Searches
By: Myles Power Edited by: Hannah I recently got the opportunity to visit one of my favorite cities in the world – New York, New York. Even though I’ve been to The Big Apple before, I’m always flabbergasted by the buildings, the people, and the general hustle and bustle of the big city.…
Interview with Charlie Veitch – The truther who changed his mind (part 2)
Myles Power interviews Charlie Veitch about why he changed his mind about 9/11 and what happened to him after he did.
Interview with Charlie Veitch – The truther who changed his mind (part 1)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r_UYZITc_90 Myles Power interviews Charlie Veitch about why he changed his mind about 9/11 and what happened to him after he did.
31 Comments on Debunking 9/11 Conspiracy Theorists
2 Trackbacks / Pingbacks
- Feature length Myles Power YouTube video | Myles Power (powerm1985)
- The Apex Truther | Myles Power (powerm1985)
Myles Power 
Great Job, man! Keep up the good work.
LikeLike
Phahaha you idiot. You believe this drivel? Hahaaha
LikeLike
Good retort.
LikeLike
That’s the best you can come up? 13 years and you still have nothing. You twoofers have a lot of psychological issues, like obsession, selective reasoning, paranoia, determination to reveal the “truth” (that always carries either a savior component, or megalomania). Not to mention they cover the entire cognitive dissonance spectrum.
LikeLike
What? didn’t you see the fat 20 year old explain to you why you are an idiot?
LikeLike
The “official narrative” is also a conspiracy theory. Under law, a conspiracy is an agreement between two or more persons to commit a crime at some time in the future, which the official narrative claims is what the 19 hijackers did.
The “official narrative” also requires its adherents to reject basic high school physics, because we have video of all three buildings collapsing, and in particular WTC 7 falls at free-fall speed, which is only possible under controlled demolition.
Before 9/11/2001, no steel building in history had ever collapsed from fire, but we are to believe on that day all 3 buildings did just that. What a coincidence. WTC 1 and 2 were designed to withstand a hit from a 707 which, although lighter than a 757, travels faster (check Wikipedia) for an equal punch.
It requires a particular sort of mental disorder to believe the official conspiracy theory despite the scientific evidence against it.
LikeLike
“Before 9/11 no steel building in history ever collapsed from fire”…. And before AND after 9/11 no steel builing in history was struck by a fully loaded, fully fueled, traveling at over 470mph and weighing over 190 tons aircraft, OR having the top of a taller building gouge out a full 1/3 of the front to center and then burning intensely causing further weakening and ultimately the NON-freefall collapse of all three which the videos prove.
LikeLiked by 1 person
You forgot to mention that these 3 buildings were all owned by the same man, Larry Silverstein.
LikeLike
‘And before AND after 9/11 no steel builing in history was struck by a fully loaded, fully fueled, traveling at over 470mph and weighing over 190 tons aircraft.’ Ever heard of El Al Flight 1862? Didn’t think so. BTW, the boeing 767s that hit the twin towers weighed 137 tons, not 190 tons.
‘OR having the top of a taller building gouge out a full 1/3 of the front to center and then burning intensely causing further weakening and ultimately the NON-freefall collapse of all three which the videos prove.’ Nice try, but none of the core columns in WTC 7 were severed by falling debris. The twin towers suffered much more damage in comparison, although still not enough to explain their collapse: WTC 1 had 6 core columns severed, WTC 2 had 10 core columns severed. Each tower had 47 core columns total.
LikeLike
You have obviously not watched the videos. If the buildings were falling “at free fall speed”, then how do you explain debris falling past the point of collapse?
“only possible under controlled demolition.” Says who? Citations please.
” but we are to believe on that day all 3 buildings did just that” Argument from personal incredulity.
“It requires a particular sort of mental disorder to believe the official conspiracy theory despite the scientific evidence against it.”
Ummm I have never seen this “scientific evidence” you refer to. So you are also claiming to be a mental disorder expert – citations please. Or are you just making a cheap-shot, ad hominem, non-sequitur?
LikeLiked by 1 person
Miles! You’re the best!
LikeLike
“You’re the best” (retard)
LikeLike
cowardly anonymous bitch
LikeLike
Thank you, Thank you, Thank you.
I was beginning to think I was the only “non-truther” out there that did not rely on ad hominem attack techniques, dismissiveness and abusive language ( which makes it almost as embarassing to be in the non-truther peer group as it might be to be in the truther camp). Those who discuss this subject (on both side) tend to come off with a “smarter than thou” attitude and tend to exceedingly illiberal thinking. Your youtube series on 9/11 is a breath of fresh air. Clear thinking with a sense of humor – but no trace of snobery or vulgarity.
And again, Thanks
LikeLiked by 1 person
OH THANK YOU FOR LYING TO PROTECT THE CORPORATE NAZIS. NOW I CAN SLEEP SOUNDLY KNOWING THAT BULLSHIT PREVAILS.
GET REAL YOU FUCKING RETARD
LikeLike
i think a simple “lolz” will suffice here. lolz
LikeLike
who’s the retard?
LikeLike
Just because a person holds attitude X, that doesn’t automatically mean they hold attitude Y. Or to put it another way, just because a person has looked at the evidence and seen that the twoof movement has nothing going for them, and their reasoning is faulty, that doesn’t mean that person automatically believes everything the government says. Far from it in some cases. However, 9/11 was not a demolition job. Time to move on, it’s been 13 years and you still have nothing.
LikeLike
The butt hurt is strong with this one
LikeLike
In the putrid pool of retards.
LikeLike
YES, FUCKING RETARDS, ALL OF THEM
LikeLike
Great work! I’ve been looking into these conspiracy theories for years and it’s rare to see anyone using real science and common sense on this issue. Keep it up and don’t let the crazies grind you down, they’ll try their best to. It’s like debating about someones religion, they see it as a personal attack.
I’ll now get ready for the “comments idiot” to leave me a reply attacking me! …. I’m used to their angry, crazy replies.
Stick with it! :)
LikeLike
I like the way some people have to resort to insulting you, as if you have some kind of agenda.
I’ve only watched the first video so far – but I think you could have done with an assistant to film while you show the footage you’re talking about to the truthers. They seem to just think you saw something wrong or are being vague about your sources, it would be great to actually point it out to them.
I love your work- keep it up!
LikeLiked by 1 person
I always say, if you have to resort to insults and name calling, you automatically lose the debate.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Myles thanks for your videos on 911 , I argue at my job with my co workers all the time. the only conspiricy I can believe is if they had proof that the us gov paid the families of the hijackers money to fly into buildings, thats easy to do, planting thermite or explosives replacing planes with missels faking the phone calls to people is the hardest one , if i call you from plane and you know its my voice calling how does gov know im calling you about hijacking? they dont know my voice. some video was saying they debunked you , its called molten alluminum, well i saw video and its thermite which explodes, it doednt debunk you
LikeLike
How did building 7 collaps without getting hit by a plane? 3rd building that went down on 9-11…
LikeLike
Well duh… Structural damage from falling debris from the other two buildings that fell as well as a very bad fire that damaged the structure internally. Do you people not read *anything* these days?
Try this site: http://www.debunking911.com/
It backs up everything here. Read it all, and inwardly digest the facts.
LikeLike
Anyone who has ever played with building blocks knows that asymmetrical structural damages would result in a toppling toward the weakened side. The videos of Bldg. 7 shows it going straight down so fast because there was no resistance below, as in controlled demolition where the underpinnings are taken out, unlike in a pancake collapse which would take much longer because each floor would resist momentarily. No plane hit Building Seven and its fires were minor. Larry Silverstein who got $4 billion and saved a billion because he did not have to remove the asbestos which had been ordered, says it was ” pulled” and the debris piles below all three towers remained far hotter than jet fuel and/or office furniture ever gets. This was observed both on site and from state of the art satellite technology. Wasn’t Silverstein lucky that he and his two adult kids who worked there decided not to go in that day and that he had insurance for a terrorist attack?
Giuliani abandoned Bldg. Seven along with the people working at the largest CIA operation outside of Langley, the FBI, the SEC & Exchange and many other high powered agencies, banks and insurance companies. When asked why he abandoned it, Rudy said he was “told the Towers would fall.” Since this did not happen when larger fires were in the Towers before, in 1970 and 1999 it seems strange. Still, who told him and why didn’t he pass the message on to alert many who had been about to evacuate them earlier but were told to return to their offices? Wasn’t it convenient he knew about the Secret War Games site set up so coincidentally nearby so he had a handy place to go?
Why did Barry Jennings hear and experience numerous explosions while trapped in the Building? Why had the fire alarm coincidentally been shut off at 6:47 am? Why was there no mention of its collapse in the 9/11 Report? So many unanswered questions.
LikeLike
Maynard, if you had watched Myles’ videos you would have made comments to counter Myles’ evidence. He provided scientific evidence and reasonable explanations for ALL the questions you brought up.
LikeLike
The video answers this question. Why do people even bother asking questions if they haven’t consumed the information to begin with? You’re assuming that the video doesn’t touch the topic of building 7, which shows your confirmation or cognitive bias. Everyone has cognitive biases, but it’s best to try minimizing them as much as possible. If you’re not going to watch the video in the first place, then why leave comments against it? It makes no sense. You people are literally asking questions that have already been answered.
LikeLike
“How did building 7 collaps without getting hit by a plane?”
It was damaged from falling debris from the other buildings. Plus it had an uncontrolled fire (they did actually try to save the building, remember).
They decided the building could not be saved so they pulled the firemen out. I guess you will argue that the hypothetical “demolition” system survived the fire, and was activated soon after.
LikeLike