Debunking 9/11 Conspiracy Theorists


A sceptical look at claims made by ‘truther’ protestors at ground zero in September 2012 from the viewpoint of a chemist. For those of you who don’t know, a ‘truther’ is a person affiliated with the 9/11 Truth movement, who rejects the official explanation provided for the 9/11 attacks and instead claims that a US government conspiracy was to blame. The videos in this series cover everything from the alleged thermite found in the dust to the collapse of World Trade Centre 7. The videos debunk every claim made by the truthers by looking at the scientific literature and studying real video evidence of the attacks.

Debunking 9/11 Conspiracy Theorists – Full Video

Pictures – New York – 2012

Debunking Where Did The Towers Go?

Interview with Charlie Veitch – the Truther Who Changed His Mind

Project Poster

debunking 911 conspiracy theorists

Other In-Depth Debunking Projects

Fact Checking March Against Monsanto ProtestersDebunking House of NumbersDebunking 911 conspiracy theoristsDebunking ChemtrailsAgent OrangeMMS and the Fake Clinical Trials

16 Comments on Debunking 9/11 Conspiracy Theorists

  1. How did the BBC know beforehand that the tower collapsed?


    • There is literally a video that talks about that right above you you halfwit.


    • You’re a terrible troll and you should feel terrible.


    • Harry Twinotter // September 11, 2015 at 8:56 am // Reply

      The BBC did not know beforehand that the tower collapsed.

      I have no idea where people get this fanciful idea from.


      • They got it from the broadcast that the towers had fallen 20 minutes before they actually had, by the way Miles does not debunk the broadcast, he just says how the bbc gets paid and scoffs about how they got that information. I find it hard to believe someone who’s argument sounds the likes of “Come on, where could they even get that story from” such an answer does not provided basis for a debunk LOL. worse than truther logic. ALSO there is a trailer for a movie coming up in 2015 of REAL LIFE ACCOUNTS LOL (people that were actually there at the site) with their accounts that suggest things went a different way than the official story. But hey if it makes you feel special believe what you want to believe. ipetgoat2


  2. Great work! Though this is mostly preaching to the choir, still great and concise. Loved your videos.


  3. You know, the best course of action when someone questions your beliefs is to call them retarded and spam the comments with nonsense.


  4. read Debunking 9/11 Debunking and have them watch


  5. Great choice with the Herb Alpert background music for part 4.


  6. Myles,

    Great videos. Btw, this is not Dr. Steven Jones’ first brush with pseudo-science. He made a name for himself in the cold fusion hoax.


  7. At last someone with knowledge. Loving the debunking of 9/11.


  8. Myles please explain to me how a building literally turns to dust. See there was no seismic activity recorded around the trade centers so it didnt slam to the ground and turn to dust, and there was very very little rubble for the size of the buildings plus jet fuel will never burn hot enough to melt steel, and why did the Empire State building not collapse after a plane flew into it but newer buildings couldn’t withstand it come on now get real


    • Harry Twinotter // September 11, 2015 at 9:01 am // Reply

      Show scientific evidence that the “building literally turns to dust”. I don’t see it myself on the videos.

      You can’t still believe the “hot enough to melt steel” hypothesis. Go on, prove you are a true skeptic and tell us the explanation for why the fire did not have to melt steel to cause structural damage.


  9. Dick Van Dyke // September 12, 2013 at 7:53 pm // Reply

    So many parts are just glazed over as they are insignificant. It is not a coincidence that for the first time in history 3 steel frame buildings all fall at free fall speed in less than 24 hours from office fires.


    • lol for a start if you watch the videos he explained almost everything you just asked. Free fall speed was not the case for any of the buildings, rubble fell at free fall speed because its not attatched to the building. WTC7 collapsed at almost free fall speed because the inside structure and floors had all collapsed before due to fire shown in the videos with pretty good diagrams so its not hard to understand even if you have no knowlege of architecture. the outside shell of WTC7 collapsed because the outer structure could not be supported with the inside floors gone.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s