Debunking 9/11 Conspiracy Theorists
A sceptical look at claims made by ‘truther’ protestors at ground zero in September 2012 from the viewpoint of a chemist. For those of you who don’t know, a ‘truther’ is a person affiliated with the 9/11 Truth movement, who rejects the official explanation provided for the 9/11 attacks and instead claims that a US government conspiracy was to blame. The videos in this series cover everything from the alleged thermite found in the dust to the collapse of World Trade Centre 7. The videos debunk every claim made by the truthers by looking at the scientific literature and studying real video evidence of the attacks.
Debunking 9/11 conspiracy theorists part 7 of 7 – Flight 93 and my final thoughts.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GOSMpf6br1k Myles discusses why he made these videos, flight 93 and clears up a few points made in the comments. Video responses http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NYaB3uP0iuI http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VVLbT5NeAUE Debunkers blog post http://911debunkers.blogspot.co.uk/2012/12/taylor-contra-powers.html Interesting YouTube comments left on my 9/11 videos https://mylespower.co.uk/2013/01/08/interesting-youtube-comments-left-on-my-91… https://mylespower.co.uk/2013/01/08/more-interesting-youtube-comments-left-on-… LaLaLaLa http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CJREWDUfNzI
Debunking 9/11 conspiracy theorists part 6 of 7 – The psychology behind a 9/11 truther
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0TELiwR0Olk In this video a good friend of Myles, Dave talks about the psychology behind a truther and discusses how they think and why they think it.
Debunking 9/11 conspiracy theorists part 5 – The BBC, Larry Silverstein and the Pentagon
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YxljFOCZ6TU In this video Myles talks about the BBC reporting that WTC7 collapsed before it had, Larry Silverstein saying “pull it” and the footage from the Pentagon.
Debunking 9/11 conspiracy theorists part 4 -How did WTC7 collapsed
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7PpsCCTMP8w Myles discusses how the WTC7 collapses.
Debunking 9/11 conspiracy theorists part 3 -Thermate, thermite and glowing aluminium
In this video Myles discusses some of the claims made by thruthers that can be disproven with a simple google search. Claims such as Al does not glow red, cuts at the base of the WTC and the difference between thermate and thermite.
Debunking 9/11 conspiracy theorists part 2 – Nano-thermite found in the WTC dust
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wbjYoINw5oI In this video Myles discussed the truthers’ claims that a peer review paper proves that nano thermite was present at the WTC. Active Thermitic Material Discovered in Dust from the 9/11 World Trade Center Catastrophe Progress Report on the Analysis of Red/Gray Chips in WTC Dust Deconstructing Access Points
Debunking 9/11 conspiracy theorists part 1 – Free fall and how the towers collapsed
Myles Power confronts 9/11 truthers to see if their claims can stand up. In this video he discusses the World Trade Center’s Design to withstand airplane impacts, fule or oxygen-starved fires, HOW THE World Trade Center’s Collapse, the twin towers falling at free fall speed and the damage to the lobbies. Pictures from this episode
A Review of Dr. Judy Wood’s Book “Where Did The Towers Go?” – Where Did The Buildings Go?
It has been well over a year since I sat down and tried to wrap my head around another chapter of Dr Judy Wood’s copyright infringing magnum opus ‘Where did The Towers Go’. In the past, I have written about her misinterpretation of the seismic data collected by Columbia University,…
A Review of Dr. Judy Wood’s Book “Where Did The Towers Go?” – Dustification
Edited by Peter The more I read of Dr. Judy Wood’s book ‘Where did The Towers Go’ the more I think that those who promoted it to me as the proof that 9/11 was an inside job have not actually read it. There is no way that they could possibly get…
A Review of Dr. Judy Wood’s Book “Where Did The Towers Go?” #3 – Conventional Controlled Demolition
Edited by Peter & Ben It’s been over a year since I sat down to review another part of Dr Judy Wood’s book ‘Where Did The Towers Go?’ so I thought it’s about time I put on my tin foil hat and dived in. This time, let’s look at the…
A Review of Dr. Judy Wood’s Book “Where Did The Towers Go?” – The Jumpers
PART 2 Edited by Peter In the first two chapters of Dr. Judy Wood’s book, she talks about the collapse rate of the twin towers and how she believed it too be inconsistent with the official story. Although she is blatantly incorrect, she never strayed to far away from the…
The Video ‘9/11 And Flight 175 Alarming Footage’ Shows How Lazy Some People Are
If there’s one thing social media has shown me over the past 10 years, it’s just how lazy some people are when it comes to checking sources of outlandish claims. How many times have you been on Facebook and seen that one of your friends has posted a link to…
A Review of Liam Scheff’s Book Official Stories – 9/11 A Perfect Tuesday Morning
Official Stories reads like the transcript of a lobotomised, paranoid, drunk talking to himself in the pub. I have recently been involved in a little bit of internet drama after producing videos critical of the AIDS denialist documentary House of Numbers. To be more specific it was after I published…
The Apex Truther
By: Myles Power Edited by: James Gurney & Hannah . I recently made a series of seven videos on YouTube, critical of the 9/11 truth movement. For those of you who don’t know, the 9/11 truth movement are a group who reject the official explanation provided for the September 11th attacks and instead, claim complicity…
Architects and Engineers Eh?
I recently made a series of seven videos on YouTube critical of the 9/11 truth movement. The videos included footage of truthers (a person affiliated with the truth movement) I talked to outside ground zero on September 11th 2012. I have over three hours of footage and most of it…
Debunking 9/11 Conspiracy Theorists Claims with Simple Google Searches
By: Myles Power Edited by: Hannah I recently got the opportunity to visit one of my favorite cities in the world – New York, New York. Even though I’ve been to The Big Apple before, I’m always flabbergasted by the buildings, the people, and the general hustle and bustle of the big city.…
Interview with Charlie Veitch – The truther who changed his mind (part 2)
Myles Power interviews Charlie Veitch about why he changed his mind about 9/11 and what happened to him after he did.
Interview with Charlie Veitch – The truther who changed his mind (part 1)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r_UYZITc_90 Myles Power interviews Charlie Veitch about why he changed his mind about 9/11 and what happened to him after he did.
Excellent and thorough analysis in the face of a veritable tsunami of bullshit.Thank you.
LikeLike
Excellent cocksucking Paddy
LikeLike
Thoroug and well put together.
Thank you
LikeLike
What a load of CRAP!
On the basis of one fact: those Boeing jets CANNOT go that fast at sea level.
No planes hit those towers! All the media was manipulated. Period!!!
LikeLike
Dale, they weren’t at sea level – they were almost 1000 ft up, and on a warm day. Also don’t confuse Knots with MPH.
LikeLike
Yeah jayhawk..You must be the little half beardys’ handler and seconder? You know those planes were not at any level at all save for the CGI level. Can you take off your pretend pilots hat and put on your physics hat..and explain to the uninitiated how an alloy air frame can penetrate a steel and concrete skyscraper, like a hot knife through butter? Can you also explain how a multi story “collapse”..mainifests itself on real time film as an upwardly and outwardly cascade of dissociating mater…or is out of context quote-mining your only skill.? Also..who gets paid more for this gig? you or the squirming little pissant?
kind regards pavlovscat7
LikeLike
Also they had been building up speed in the descent.
LikeLike
IF what you’re saying were true, then no plane could land at sea level, and consequently, there would not be any airports at sea level, contrary to the fact that 1. planes CAN and DO land at sea level, and 2. the are many airports at/near sea level (e.g., JFK)
LikeLike
Great video. Thanks. I learnt a lot and my concerns have been laid to rest
LikeLike
LikeLike
Can a debunker explain why Bush said he saw the first plane hit on TV before it was broadcast? And why he said he thought it was just a bad pilot…
I’m not going after an argument, I just cant find any debunkers who explain this. If he had of seen what we all saw, as he said he did, he a) couldn’t of seen it before he walked into the children’s classroom as he claimed and b) he can’t have seriously thought no one was killed in the impact as he claimed because there was a huge fireball when the plane hit. I would really love to hear a debunkers theory on this, because I cant get my head around this. It’s one thing to make a mistake on the time of day, but he said he saw it before he went into the classroom, well before the footage was broadcast. He claimed to have seen it on the news, but that couldn’t of been the case. I’d really love it if a debunker will try to answer this, as I can’t seem to find any. I’ve seen almost all the other theory’s attempted to be debunked, just not this one. And I guess another is Bush’s claim that the american government hadn’t ever considered the use of planes in buildings before as terrorist activity, but there is evidence to show that only months before they had been looking into just that activity, and making drills out of the idea too. Why would he say they hadn’t thought of it before when they clearly had done? Again, not looking for an argument. Just asking debunkers to answer these questions, as, as I said, I’ve not seen them explained by debunkers before.
LikeLike
Bush was reading a book to kindergartners when the first plane hit. And, since he’s not a great reader, he was still reading the book when the second plane hit. He was getting the info in the classroom from an aide and it was broadcast on TV.
I’m sure the conspiracy theorist in you wants to tell me that was all staged and that Bush was in on it. Because that is the only road you can go down, which happens to be a common one in other lame brain conspiracies.
LikeLike
Excellent work Myles….. Nevertheless, I doubt if this will alter the thinking and attitude of Dumb & Co. Listen to the silence when you ask 9/11 truthers to explain in detail and with evidence their alternative version of the 9/11 attacks.
LikeLike
Finally some factual and sensible reasoning – outstanding website
LikeLike
Excellent shilling Myles. Never mind the fact you are facilitated by the loose and firm associations of the murderous agents that concocted this 9/11 false flag..never mind the fact that anyone with a modicom of intuition left can see through your statement-confirmation methodology..never mind the fact you are that little coward in the schoolyard that crawls up the bullys arse..never mind any of the amorality that you and your kind need when any twinge of conscience repents in your thoughts..never mind any of that. Just take comfort in the fact that guttless cowardice is as valid an identity as any other in the world of tooth and claw. Take comfort in the fact your cowardice will never have you engaged in your facetious interrogatories with real men that would tear your little grub head off. You are and will for life be, the little pissant with an opus of pissant art. Your mother I’m sure must be very proud of you..even though you must hate her and your father for your degenerate, cowards, DNA.
Please excuse my fawning hagiography of your saintly concern for the truth and for humanity Myles… when I become a little more mature I will treat your art with a little more objectivity…you stinking irrelevant turd.xxxx
AND as an afterthough truthers..this pissant shill is a primers’ intro to astroturfing and disinfoing…if you want to see and read the motherload….the breeding ground of limited hangouts..go to Off Guardian website. Amongst the tribe of limited hangouts there (99.9%) There is a dog there that calls itself Norman Pilon..he makes this Myles of Lies pissant look like a rank amateur. Be Lucky truthers..call these grubs for what they are..
kind regards, pavlovscat7
LikeLike
your either an idiot or are complicit.
LikeLike